Today the BC Court of Appeal released a case that will have a profound impact for many people recovering from a car accident in BC.
Under the law in BC, a injured person has access to two pools of money. One through the Tort claim which results in compensation at the end of the claim. The other pool of money is through "no fault" or "Part 7" benefits, which are paid up front.
Under the "no fault" benefits, there are some mandatory benefits which ICBC MUST pay, subject to certain conditions. There are also some discretionary benefits which ICBC may pay.
ICBC has long held (when it suits its interest) that benefits for massage therapy is discretionary and ICBC's policy is to pay for up to twelve visits in the first 8 weeks.
Today in Raguin v. ICBC, Madam Justice Rowles sent ICBC a very different message. Massage therapy benefits are actually a MANDATORY benefit. That means, if you meet the requirements of the regulation, ICBC MUST pay for your massage therapy up front.
The decision today should make paying for treatment much easier for many people. The problem that many people with ICBC claims will likely run into is forcing ICBC to pay for these treatments even if the Court of Appeal has told ICBC that they are mandatory.
As a law firm, McComb Witten is putting together a strategy to enforce this benefit for our clients. We do not expect ICBC to pay willingly. Our job as lawyers, however, is to get the money for our clients that they have a right to, but ICBC does not want to pay.
In fact, that last statement is exactly the reason why people with ICBC claims hire lawyers and the reason I enjoy being a personal injury lawyer in Vancouver, BC.
Under the law in BC, a injured person has access to two pools of money. One through the Tort claim which results in compensation at the end of the claim. The other pool of money is through "no fault" or "Part 7" benefits, which are paid up front.
Under the "no fault" benefits, there are some mandatory benefits which ICBC MUST pay, subject to certain conditions. There are also some discretionary benefits which ICBC may pay.
ICBC has long held (when it suits its interest) that benefits for massage therapy is discretionary and ICBC's policy is to pay for up to twelve visits in the first 8 weeks.
Today in Raguin v. ICBC, Madam Justice Rowles sent ICBC a very different message. Massage therapy benefits are actually a MANDATORY benefit. That means, if you meet the requirements of the regulation, ICBC MUST pay for your massage therapy up front.
The decision today should make paying for treatment much easier for many people. The problem that many people with ICBC claims will likely run into is forcing ICBC to pay for these treatments even if the Court of Appeal has told ICBC that they are mandatory.
As a law firm, McComb Witten is putting together a strategy to enforce this benefit for our clients. We do not expect ICBC to pay willingly. Our job as lawyers, however, is to get the money for our clients that they have a right to, but ICBC does not want to pay.
In fact, that last statement is exactly the reason why people with ICBC claims hire lawyers and the reason I enjoy being a personal injury lawyer in Vancouver, BC.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.